a站被罚12万元

Coupang turns away antitrust inspectors in unprecedented move as FTC chief threatens criminal referral_我的网站

A |     

　    一键部署OpenClaw        2026年做网站开发，还在一行行手写代码？那你可能已经落后了。

B |     这一年，AI建站工具迎来了爆发式增长。    Coupang has sued to halt a Fair Trade Commission inspection into whether price-matching coupon costs were shifted to suppliers.                    Coupang trucks are parked near the e-commerce platform's logistics center in Seoul on Dec. 29, 2025. YONHAPCoupang has repelled attempts by inspectors from the antitrust watchdog to launch an on-site inspection over allegations that the e-commerce powerhouse shifted costs to suppliers. In rebuffing the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) officers, the company said that it has not received a legally required notice prior to the inspection. FTC Chairman Ju Biung-ghi said after the failed raid on Wednesday that he will pursue criminal charges.Coupang's refusal to comply with an on-site investigation by the FTC marks the first time since the regulator was established that a company has rejected an inspection outright, in this case on the grounds that "the law was applied improperly."The commission attempted to launch inspections at Coupang on four occasions, from Aug. 19 to Friday and again on Monday, but withdrew each time.Investigators were seeking to determine whether Coupang improperly passed the cost of its "price-matching coupons" on to its suppliers.The coupons are issued automatically when a product sold on the platform is priced higher than on a competing online marketplace, bringing the actual purchase price down to roughly the lowest available. The commission is examining whether the resulting discount costs were shifted onto suppliers.Coupang's argument against the investigation revolves around a notification clause in the law that was not applied. Article 17 of the Framework Act on Administrative Investigations requires an administrative agency, as a general rule, to notify the subject of an on-site inspection in writing at least seven days in advance.                    The Korean headquarters of e-commerce platform Coupang in Songpa District, southern Seoul NEWS1In a statement on Tuesday, Coupang said the notice requirement is "a lawful procedure that guarantees the interests and rights of the party under investigation" and that the company "plans to seek a court ruling on the commission's failure to observe that procedure."However, the same article stipulates that the notice "may be presented to the person subject to investigation simultaneously with the commencement of the administrative investigation or the purposes" when "it is deemed impossible to achieve the purposes of the investigation due to an anticipated destruction of evidence."The commission's position is that the exception applies here because advance notice would have created a risk of evidence destruction. Coupang counters that this investigation does not meet the conditions for the exception.The e-commerce titan argues that the concern is not credible given that it cooperated with other extended on-site inspections at its headquarters by the commission and other government agencies from January, following a massive personal data breach.The outcome now rests with the courts. On Friday, Coupang filed a suit seeking to cancel the commission's decision and disposition authorizing the on-site inspection, along with an injunction to halt the investigation.                    Delivery trucks wait at a Coupang logistics center in Seoul. YONHAP"It is unusual for an on-site inspection by the commission to fall apart because the company under investigation refused it," an industry source told the JoongAng Ilbo. "Depending on the court's decision, the commission's overall practice of conducting on-site inspections without advance notice could be shaken, and other companies under investigation could demand procedural rights the way Coupang has."The ruling liberal Democratic Party sharply criticized Coupang's refusal to comply with the investigation, saying no company can stand above Korean law."Coupang is using claims of discrimination against U.S. companies by the U.S. government and political circles as a shield to evade legitimate domestic regulation and investigation," DP spokesperson Lee Yong-woo said Wednesday in a written statement. "The company's double standard, enjoying enormous profits in the Korean market but invoking its status as a U.S. company only when it is time to take responsibility, is infuriating."。

C | 有数据显示，全球已有超过2000万个网站通过AI驱动的构建器搭建。某研究机构更是预测，到2026年，75%的新建网站将采用AI驱动的无代码开发方式。

D |     从“写代码”到“用自然语言生成应用”，AI正在彻底改变网站开发的方式。下面这5款工具，是2026年最值得关注的AI建站利器。    1. OpenAI Codex Sites：一句话上线一个网站    如果说ChatGPT让“写代码”变得像聊天一样简单，那么OpenAI最新推出的Codex Sites，则让“上线网站”也变成了一句话的事。你只需要描述需求，Codex不仅能帮你生成网页，还能直接部署、托管，并生成可访问的URL。整个过程不再需要服务器、不需要配置CI/CD。以前流程是“需求→设计→开发→测试→部署→上线”，现在变成了“需求→Codex→上线”。    2. 阿里云Meoo秒悟：国内首款AI闭环开发平台    如果你是国内用户，Meoo秒悟可能是更合适的选择。它是国内首款面向非技术人群的AI闭环开发平台，支持“一句话生成应用”——自动产出前后端、数据库、云资源，并提供可视化编辑与一键部署。简单应用最快47秒生成，复杂小程序3-5分钟完成。内置阿里云数据库、函数计算、OSS存储，无需手动开通配置云资源。    3. Bolt.new：浏览器里的全栈AI开发    Bolt.new让你在浏览器里用自然语言描述Web应用需求，AI自动生成完整代码（前端+后端+数据库），并提供云端预览和一键部署。

E | 和Cursor等编辑器内AI助手不同，Bolt.new的目标是让产品经理、设计师、非技术人员也能产出可用应用。    4. Lovable：10分钟上线完整App    如果你有产品想法但不会写代码，Lovable是目前最快让你看到东西跑起来的工具。

F | 有用户实测，从开始对话到生成一个可用的图片压缩工具页面，只花了大约10分钟。

G | 如果手写这个页面，从搭环境到写完逻辑，至少要半天。    5. 百度秒哒：多智能体协作的AI开发团队    百度秒哒内置了产品策划、前端开发、后端开发、UI设计、测试等多个专业AI智能体，它们会模拟真实开发团队协同工作。你得到的不是一个代码生成器，而是一个“AI开发团队”。    这5款工具各有侧重——有的适合快速上线展示页，有的适合全栈应用开发，有的适合企业级项目。

H | 选对了工具，80%的重复劳动都可以交给AI。关键是，你得知道自己需要什么。

申请创业报道，分享创业好点子。点击此处，共同探讨创业新机遇！。

Current article:http://cip49v.menfangongbeifei.sbs/yb12l/20260826/621607.xlsx

Published on:00:29:49